Showing posts with label parliamentary election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label parliamentary election. Show all posts

14 November 2008

All Hail to the Chief

With the 2008 Guinea-Bissau parliamentary election looming overhead now seems like an apt time to examine the foundation of law in Guinea-Bissau: The Constitution. Initially adopted in 1984, the Guinean Constitution contains a number of fairly concerning articles relating to the creation and control of government.

The Constitution of Guinea-Bissau describes the government as “the supreme executive and administrative organ of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau… [it] conducts the general politics of the country in accordance with its program, approved by the National Popular Assembly.” Article 97 of the Constitution also defines the Prime Minister and various secretaries as the “the government.” In most parliamentary systems the Prime Minister title would indicate an official chosen by the legislature from its own number, however the Guinea-Bissau system takes a different tact on this aspect: the President nominates the Prime Minister as well as the cabinet, as stated in Article 98:

“Article 98
(1) The Prime Minister is nominated by the President of the Republic in accordance with electoral results and after consulting with political parties represented in the National Popular Assembly.
(2) Ministers and secretaries of state are nominated by the President of the Republic, on the proposal of the Prime Minister.”

At first this appears unusual, but hardly sinister. However, as we have noted in previous posts the President, rather than the Prime Minister, also has the power to dissolve parliament. Ergo, the President has the capacity to both hire and fire the government as a whole; President Vieira demonstrated this power earlier this year when he shut down the government, dissolved parliament, and appointed a new Prime Minister and cabinet of his choosing to run a temporary government. He did so without consulting the parliament because he had temporarily done away with that particular constitutionally guaranteed aspect of government.

Further, Article 62 defines the President as “the Head of State, symbol of unity, guarantor of national independence and the Constitution and supreme commander of the Armed Forces,” a particularly unsettling fact given that President Vieira was formerly the country’s dictator who gained power by force, overthrowing the previous government. Article 120 also gives the President the final say over the selection of and power to swear in Justices of the Guinean Supreme Court.

Given the de facto dictatorship given to the President by the constitution, what is the point of having a free and fairly elected legislature? Is there a free and fairly elected legislature in Guinea-Bissau? President Vieira’s power over parliament, the judiciary system, and the armed forces shows a clear lack of checks and balances that is an impediment to the “pluralistic, free and just society” which the preamble of the Guinean constitution mandates.


Discussion of elections gives legitimacy to a government and in the case of Guinea-Bissau we must admit that the results of the election will only serve to make the government only appear more legitimate. The truth is that nearly all of the power of actual governance is concentrated in the hands of the president; Parliamentary elections in Guinea-Bissau do not signify that the voice of the people will be heard in policy making - How can they when the results are subject to the will of the President?

Sources:
Constitution of Guinea Bissau
Guinea Bissau in turmoil after Parliament Dissolved (AFP)

26 September 2008

2004 Electoral Rewind

In order to be prepared for the parliamentary election coming up on November 16th (pending funding from some external source) we’re going to do a little recap of the trials and tribulation of the last parliamentary election, which happened on March 28th, 2004. The results were as follows:


Party Valid Votes % [of Valid Votes] Seats
African Party for the Independence of Guinea-Bissau and Cape Verde (PAIGC) 141,455 31.45% 45
Social Renovation Party (PRS) 11,354 2.52% 35
United Social Democratic Party (PUSD) 72,362 16.09% 17
Electoral Union (UE) 18,253 4.06% 2
United Popular Alliance 5,776 1.28% 1
Others 100,555 22.36% 0

Source: http://www.electionguide.org/results.php?ID=195)

These numbers suggest that the vote remainder (e.g. LR Imperiali) or averages method (e.g. D’Hondt ) are beneficial to the larger parties, PAIGC and PRS.

We mentioned last week that the upcoming election was appealing to foreign donors for financing, which is not surprising in the context: Guinea-Bissau’s last parliamentary election was funded by foreign backers. The primary reasoning behind this funding was a hope that through free and fair elections Guinea-BissauSierra Leone could become an example for unstable countries such as , Liberia and Cote d’Ivoire which are in its geographical proximity. This was not a success. The elections were plagued with accusations of election fraud made by the PRS, and disenfranchisement was rampant.

Foreign observers from the United Nations, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), the Community of Portuguese Speaking Countries, La Francophonie and bilateral donors such as Portugal, Russia and the United States were present and noted that “one third of all polling stations in Bissau had remained closed.” This is particularly unsettling because Bissau is home to a third of the countries 1.3 million people.

Polling stations that were closed were open the next day for voting, but there is no assurance that all those who had attempted to vote on the actual election had the opportunity to cast their ballots. A number of polling stations which opened hours behind schedule on election day were told to remain open later in order for more citizens to vote, “…though an electricity cut meant that voting would have to take place by torch and candle light.”

During the previous election funding came primarily from western sources such as the United States, Russia, and Portugal. Given the recent increase in interaction between China and Guinea-Bissau, and the PRC’s avid interest in currying favor among African nations we wonder if the funding for this year’s election might not have a more diverse background. On August 28th of this year ground was broken on new government ministerial buildings that are being built thanks to funds donated by the PRC. President Vieira remarked that ”the Guinea-Bissau government was sincerely grateful for China's generous help” and “the Chinese government and its people have always been willing to help African nations as a whole,” There have also been reports of Macau and mainland China interest in investing in Guinea-Bissau in a number of areas including telecommunications, natural resources, and a potential buy out of Bissau Air by the Chinese government. We suspect that this evidence of increased economic dealings will be followed by greater investment in Guinea-Bissau’s infrastructure in order to better facilitate trade and significant financial assistance in the November 16th election to strengthen ties with the Guinea-Bissau government.

But no matter what the funding source this year, the lack of organization in Guinea-Bissau’s previous parliamentary election and the added unrest caused by President Vieira’s dissolution of parliament in August it’s safe to say that the upcoming election is sure to be an interesting occasion.

Sources:

http://www.irinnews.org/Report.aspx?ReportId=49307

http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?reportid=49802

http://www.electionguide.org/results.php?ID=195

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-08/29/content_9734165.htm

http://www.macaudailytimesnews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=16447&Itemid=28


Written by Andrea

Contributions by Andrew